• Overview No-Go-* as a Dev Project
  • Intro, Goals
  • Anticipated Results
  • Advanced Adversaries
  • Business-related
• Products No-Go-* anticipated Deliverables
  • Products
  • Complementary (i.e. on Firewalls, Anti-Virus)
  • Features
  • Concerns
• What else? … Miscellaneous Questions
  • Competitors
  • Cybersecurity
  • Term clarifications
• More? … Questions with No Answer Yet …

Miscellaneous Questions (What else?)

Competitors

• Q _C1: Who is No-Go-*^™ competing with?
  • Short A: No tech or business has dared to call for an end of cyberwar (yet)
    Longer A: …

• Q _C2: Does something similar to No-Go-Security^™ already exist?
  • Short A: Not to our knowledge; please get in touch with us if you own relevant IP
    Longer A: …

Cybersecurity

• Q _C3: Is cryptography used, and is it up to the task?
  • Short A: Yes, and No. Cryptography isn’t doing enough against stolen or misused keys
    Longer A: …

• Q _C4: Is No-Go-Security™ secure against quantum computation?
  • Short A: Yes, very likely
    Longer A: …

• Q _C5: Why is cybersecurity not better in securing users?
  • Short A: Cybersecurity is complex, and it is considered essential but treated as a side-show
    Longer A: …

• Q _C6: What makes security in other sectors so much more successful?
  • Short A: Security in other sectors is more confident due to proactive toolsets
    Longer A: …

• Q _C7: Who is more exposed in a cyberwar?
  • Short A: … that is probably changing over time …
    Longer A: …

• Q _C8: Will governments or the military push back on No-Go-*^™?
  • Short A: Probably not
    Longer A: …

• Q _C9: Who may resist the changes from No-Go-*^™?
  • Short A: … we will see …
    Longer A: …

• Q _C10: What is the opinion of cybersecurity professionals about No-Go-Security^™?
  • Short A: It’s new, not tested; but we got important hints (thanks)
    Longer A: …

• Q _C11: Why don’t you care about vulnerabilities?
  • Short A: We care, but not s much as you should care without No-Go-Security
    Longer A: …

Term clarifications

• Q _C12: Is promising no damage from malware a flawed statement
  • Short A: Not really. Damage is something that should be avoided/prevented
    Longer A: …

• Q _C13: What is security in comparison to safety?
  • Short A: Both terms mean freedom from harm, threat, and danger
    Longer A: …

• Q _C14: What is the difference between white- and graylisting?
  • Short A: Whitelisted are based on authorized data, graylisted on detected patterns and statistics
    Longer A: …

• Q _C15: What are deviations or anomalies?
  • Short A: They are results that were not expected from disclosures, patterns, or predictions
    Longer A: …

• Q _C16: Why is proactive security so much better than reactive?
  • Short A: Proactive measures prevent damage early
    Longer A: …

• Q _C17: Why is prevention in security important?
  • Short A: Prevention (in No-Go) expects damage and prepares us to deal with its consequences
    Longer A: …

• Q _C18: What is the advantage of independent circuit breakers?
  • Short A: Preventing damage and gaining time for additional actions
    Longer A: …

• Q _C19: What does it mean: it is impossible?
  • Short A: Impossible is a strong prediction; it is dangerous to overgeneralize impossibility
    Longer A: …